AI 모델 인텔리전스 플랫폼
← 비교 페이지로 돌아가기

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Llama 4 Scout

Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLlama 4 Scout
공급자GoogleMeta
컨텍스트 창1,048,57610,000,000
출시일2025-04-05
입력 가격$0.25/ 1M 토큰$0.10/ 1M 토큰
출력 가격$1.50/ 1M 토큰$0.50/ 1M 토큰
추천 용도high-volume · classification · lightweight chat · extractionlong-context · summarization · agentic · chatbot

기능 매트릭스

Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLlama 4 Scout
비전
추론
코딩
오디오
도구 호출
긴 컨텍스트

랭킹 비교

Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLlama 4 Scout
종합47.147.1
벤치마크00
기능85.785.7
가격 효율100100
컨텍스트100100

종합 = 벤치마크 50% + 기능 20% + 가격 효율 20% + 컨텍스트 10%.

벤치마크 비교

Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteLlama 4 Scout
코딩
추론
수학
비전

가격 이력

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

날짜입력출력
2026-08-05$0.25$1.50

/ 1M 토큰

Llama 4 Scout

날짜입력출력
2026-08-05$0.10$0.50

/ 1M 토큰

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Google's most cost-efficient Gemini 3.1 model for high-volume lightweight tasks.

Llama 4 Scout

Meta's efficient open-weight model with a massive 10M context window.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which model is better: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Llama 4 Scout?

Based on overall scores, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ranks higher (47.1 vs 47.1). See the comparison table for a full breakdown.

Which model is cheaper: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.1 vs $0.25 per 1M input tokens.

What are the capability differences between Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 오디오; Llama 4 Scout: 추론