Plataforma de Inteligencia de Modelos de IA
← Volver a comparar

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Hunyuan TurboS

Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteHunyuan TurboS
ProveedorGoogleTencent
Ventana de contexto1.048.576256.000
Fecha de lanzamiento2025-05-21
Precio de entrada$0.25/ 1M tokens$0.12/ 1M tokens
Precio de salida$1.50/ 1M tokens$0.30/ 1M tokens
Ideal parahigh-volume · classification · lightweight chat · extractionchatbot · fast inference · Chinese content · high-volume

Capacidades

Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteHunyuan TurboS
Visión
Razonamiento
Codificación
Audio
Llamada a herramientas
Contexto largo

Comparación de ranking

Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteHunyuan TurboS
General47.141.4
Benchmark00
Capacidad85.757.1
Eficiencia de precio100100
Contexto100100

General = Benchmark 50% + Capacidad 20% + Eficiencia de precio 20% + Contexto 10%.

Comparación de benchmarks

Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteHunyuan TurboS
Programación
Razonamiento
Matemáticas
Visión

Historial de precios

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

FechaEntradaSalida
2026-08-05$0.25$1.50

/ 1M tokens

Hunyuan TurboS

FechaEntradaSalida
2026-08-05$0.12$0.30

/ 1M tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Google's most cost-efficient Gemini 3.1 model for high-volume lightweight tasks.

Hunyuan TurboS

Tencent's fast hybrid-thinking model with low latency.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which model is better: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Hunyuan TurboS?

Based on overall scores, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ranks higher (47.1 vs 41.4). See the comparison table for a full breakdown.

Which model is cheaper: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite or Hunyuan TurboS?

Hunyuan TurboS is cheaper: $0.12 vs $0.25 per 1M input tokens.

What are the capability differences between Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and Hunyuan TurboS?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Visión, Audio; Hunyuan TurboS: Razonamiento