AI Model Intelligence Platform
← Back to compare

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Claude Opus 5Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Context Window200,0001,048,576
Release Date
Input Price$5.00/ 1M tokens$0.25/ 1M tokens
Output Price$25.00/ 1M tokens$1.50/ 1M tokens
Best forcomplex reasoning · agentic coding · enterprise · researchhigh-volume · classification · lightweight chat · extraction

Capabilities

Claude Opus 5Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Vision
Reasoning
Coding
Audio
Tools
Long Context

Ranking Comparison

Claude Opus 5Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Overall47.147.1
Benchmark00
Capability85.785.7
Price Efficiency100100
Context100100

Overall = Benchmark 50% + Capability 20% + Price Efficiency 20% + Context 10%.

Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 5Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Coding
Reasoning
Math
Vision

Price History

Claude Opus 5

DateInputOutput
2026-08-05$5.00$25.00

/ 1M tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

DateInputOutput
2026-08-05$0.25$1.50

/ 1M tokens

Claude Opus 5

Anthropic's most powerful model for complex agentic coding and enterprise workloads.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Google's most cost-efficient Gemini 3.1 model for high-volume lightweight tasks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which model is better: Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

Based on overall scores, Claude Opus 5 ranks higher (47.1 vs 47.1). See the comparison table for a full breakdown.

Which model is cheaper: Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is cheaper: $0.25 vs $5 per 1M input tokens.

What are the capability differences between Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

Claude Opus 5: Reasoning; Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Audio