AI Model Intelligence Platform
← Back to compare

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Claude Opus 4.8Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Context Window1,000,0001,048,576
Release Date2025-07-17
Input Price$5.00/ 1M tokens$0.10/ 1M tokens
Output Price$25.00/ 1M tokens$0.40/ 1M tokens
Best foragentic coding · complex reasoning · enterprise · researchhigh-volume · low-latency · classification · edge tasks

Capabilities

Claude Opus 4.8Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Vision
Reasoning
Coding
Audio
Tools
Long Context

Ranking Comparison

Claude Opus 4.8Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Overall47.147.1
Benchmark00
Capability85.785.7
Price Efficiency100100
Context100100

Overall = Benchmark 50% + Capability 20% + Price Efficiency 20% + Context 10%.

Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 4.8Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Coding
Reasoning
Math
Vision

Price History

Claude Opus 4.8

DateInputOutput
2026-08-05$5.00$25.00

/ 1M tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

DateInputOutput
2026-08-05$0.10$0.40

/ 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic's top-tier model for complex agentic coding and enterprise workloads.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Google's most cost-efficient 2.5-series model for high-volume low-latency tasks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which model is better: Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Based on overall scores, Claude Opus 4.8 ranks higher (47.1 vs 47.1). See the comparison table for a full breakdown.

Which model is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper: $0.1 vs $5 per 1M input tokens.

What are the capability differences between Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Claude Opus 4.8: Reasoning; Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: Audio