AI Model Intelligence Platform
← Back to compare

Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek Reasoner

Claude Opus 4.8DeepSeek Reasoner
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Context Window1,000,000128,000
Release Date2025-03-24
Input Price$5.00/ 1M tokens$0.55/ 1M tokens
Output Price$25.00/ 1M tokens$2.19/ 1M tokens
Best foragentic coding · complex reasoning · enterprise · researchmathematics · logic · coding · complex QA

Capabilities

Claude Opus 4.8DeepSeek Reasoner
Vision
Reasoning
Coding
Audio
Tools
Long Context

Ranking Comparison

Claude Opus 4.8DeepSeek Reasoner
Overall47.179.6
Benchmark089.3
Capability85.742.9
Price Efficiency100100
Context10064

Overall = Benchmark 50% + Capability 20% + Price Efficiency 20% + Context 10%.

Benchmark Comparison

Claude Opus 4.8DeepSeek Reasoner
Coding
Reasoning
Math
Vision

Price History

Claude Opus 4.8

DateInputOutput
2026-08-05$5.00$25.00

/ 1M tokens

DeepSeek Reasoner

DateInputOutput
2026-08-05$0.55$2.19

/ 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic's top-tier model for complex agentic coding and enterprise workloads.

DeepSeek Reasoner

DeepSeek's reasoning model (R1 series) with strong math and logic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which model is better: Claude Opus 4.8 or DeepSeek Reasoner?

Based on overall scores, DeepSeek Reasoner ranks higher (79.6 vs 47.1). See the comparison table for a full breakdown.

Which model is cheaper: Claude Opus 4.8 or DeepSeek Reasoner?

DeepSeek Reasoner is cheaper: $0.55 vs $5 per 1M input tokens.

What are the capability differences between Claude Opus 4.8 and DeepSeek Reasoner?

Claude Opus 4.8: Vision, Long Context