Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GLM-4
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | GLM-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Zhipu |
| Context Window | 200,000 | 128,000 |
| Release Date | 2024-06-20 | 2024-01-16 |
| Input Price | $3.00/ 1M tokens | $0.35/ 1M tokens |
| Output Price | $15.00/ 1M tokens | $0.70/ 1M tokens |
| Best for | coding · writing · chatbot · analysis | — |
Capabilities
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | GLM-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | ✓ | ✗ |
| Reasoning | ✓ | ✗ |
| Coding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Audio | ✗ | ✗ |
| Tools | ✓ | ✗ |
| Long Context | ✓ | ✗ |
Ranking Comparison
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | GLM-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 78.4 | 60.1 |
| Benchmark | 80 | 80.8 |
| Capability | 85.7 | 0 |
| Price Efficiency | 100 | 100 |
| Context | 100 | 64 |
Overall = Benchmark 50% + Capability 20% + Price Efficiency 20% + Context 10%.
Benchmark Comparison
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | GLM-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Coding | 92 | 80.1 |
| Reasoning | — | — |
| Math | 88.7 | 81.5 |
| Vision | — | — |
Price History
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
| Date | Input | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-11 | $3.00 | $15.00 |
/ 1M tokens
GLM-4
No price history yet.
/ 1M tokens
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic's flagship model known for strong coding and nuanced writing.
GLM-4
GLM-4 conversational model
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Data Reliability
Benchmark · VerifiedOfficial · Verified
Data confidence: 90%
GLM-4
Data Reliability
Benchmark · VerifiedOfficial · Experimental
Data confidence: 90%
Why compare these models?
These models are compared because:
- • Similar benchmark performance
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet if:
- • Higher overall score
Choose GLM-4 if:
- • Lower input price
Frequently Asked Questions
Which model is better: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GLM-4?
Based on overall scores, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ranks higher (78.4 vs 60.1). See the comparison table for a full breakdown.
Which model is cheaper: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GLM-4?
GLM-4 is cheaper: $0.35 vs $3 per 1M input tokens.
What are the capability differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GLM-4?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Vision, Reasoning, Coding, Tools, Long Context