AI-Modell-Intelligence-Plattform
← Zurück zum Vergleich

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Claude 3.5 SonnetGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
AnbieterAnthropicGoogle
Kontextfenster200.0001.048.576
Erscheinungsdatum2024-06-20
Eingabepreis$3.00/ 1M Tokens$0.25/ 1M Tokens
Ausgabepreis$15.00/ 1M Tokens$1.50/ 1M Tokens
Geeignet fürcoding · writing · chatbot · analysishigh-volume · classification · lightweight chat · extraction

Funktionen

Claude 3.5 SonnetGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Vision
Schlussfolgerung
Programmierung
Audio
Tool-Aufruf
Langer Kontext

Ranking-Vergleich

Claude 3.5 SonnetGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Gesamt47.147.1
Benchmark00
Fähigkeit85.785.7
Preiseffizienz100100
Kontext100100

Gesamt = Benchmark 50% + Fähigkeit 20% + Preiseffizienz 20% + Kontext 10%.

Benchmark-Vergleich

Claude 3.5 SonnetGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Programmierung
Schlussfolgerung
Mathematik
Vision

Preisverlauf

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

DatumEingabeAusgabe
2026-08-05$3.00$15.00

/ 1M Tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

DatumEingabeAusgabe
2026-08-05$0.25$1.50

/ 1M Tokens

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic's flagship model known for strong coding and nuanced writing.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Google's most cost-efficient Gemini 3.1 model for high-volume lightweight tasks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which model is better: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

Based on overall scores, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ranks higher (47.1 vs 47.1). See the comparison table for a full breakdown.

Which model is cheaper: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is cheaper: $0.25 vs $3 per 1M input tokens.

What are the capability differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Schlussfolgerung; Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Audio