AI-Modell-Intelligence-Plattform
← Zurück zum Vergleich

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B vs Gemini 1.5 Pro

Qwen2.5 Coder 32BGemini 1.5 Pro
AnbieterAlibabaGoogle
Kontextfenster131.0722.000.000
Erscheinungsdatum2024-11-122024-02-15
Eingabepreis$0.90/ 1M Tokens$1.25/ 1M Tokens
Ausgabepreis$1.80/ 1M Tokens$5.00/ 1M Tokens
Geeignet fürmultimodal · long-context analysis · chatbot · document processing

Funktionen

Qwen2.5 Coder 32BGemini 1.5 Pro
Vision
Schlussfolgerung
Programmierung
Audio
Tool-Aufruf
Langer Kontext

Ranking-Vergleich

Qwen2.5 Coder 32BGemini 1.5 Pro
Gesamt15.976.9
Benchmark070.8
Fähigkeit0100
Preiseffizienz100100
Kontext65.5100

Gesamt = Benchmark 50% + Fähigkeit 20% + Preiseffizienz 20% + Kontext 10%.

Benchmark-Vergleich

Qwen2.5 Coder 32BGemini 1.5 Pro
Programmierung
Schlussfolgerung
Mathematik
Vision

Preisverlauf

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B

Noch kein Preisverlauf vorhanden.

/ 1M Tokens

Gemini 1.5 Pro

DatumEingabeAusgabe
2026-08-11$1.25$5.00

/ 1M Tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B coding model

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Google's long-context multimodal model supporting up to 2M tokens.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B

Data Reliability

Benchmark · ExperimentalOfficial · Experimental

Data confidence: 50%

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Data Reliability

Benchmark · VerifiedOfficial · Verified

Data confidence: 90%

Why compare these models?

These models are compared because:

  • • Comparable pricing

Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B if:

  • • Lower input price

Choose Gemini 1.5 Pro if:

  • • Higher overall score

Frequently Asked Questions

Which model is better: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B or Gemini 1.5 Pro?

Based on overall scores, Gemini 1.5 Pro ranks higher (76.9 vs 15.9). See the comparison table for a full breakdown.

Which model is cheaper: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B or Gemini 1.5 Pro?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B is cheaper: $0.9 vs $1.25 per 1M input tokens.

What are the capability differences between Qwen2.5 Coder 32B and Gemini 1.5 Pro?

Gemini 1.5 Pro: Vision, Schlussfolgerung, Programmierung, Audio, Tool-Aufruf, Langer Kontext