AI-Modell-Intelligence-Plattform
← Zurück zum Vergleich

Qwen2.5 72B vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Qwen2.5 72BClaude 3.5 Sonnet
AnbieterAlibabaAnthropic
Kontextfenster131.072200.000
Erscheinungsdatum2024-09-192024-06-20
Eingabepreis$1.20/ 1M Tokens$3.00/ 1M Tokens
Ausgabepreis$2.40/ 1M Tokens$15.00/ 1M Tokens
Geeignet fürcoding · writing · chatbot · analysis

Funktionen

Qwen2.5 72BClaude 3.5 Sonnet
Vision
Schlussfolgerung
Programmierung
Audio
Tool-Aufruf
Langer Kontext

Ranking-Vergleich

Qwen2.5 72BClaude 3.5 Sonnet
Gesamt62.678.4
Benchmark8680
Fähigkeit085.7
Preiseffizienz100100
Kontext65.5100

Gesamt = Benchmark 50% + Fähigkeit 20% + Preiseffizienz 20% + Kontext 10%.

Benchmark-Vergleich

Qwen2.5 72BClaude 3.5 Sonnet
Programmierung85.992
Schlussfolgerung
Mathematik86.188.7
Vision

Preisverlauf

Qwen2.5 72B

Noch kein Preisverlauf vorhanden.

/ 1M Tokens

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

DatumEingabeAusgabe
2026-08-11$3.00$15.00

/ 1M Tokens

Qwen2.5 72B

Qwen2.5 72B open model

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic's flagship model known for strong coding and nuanced writing.

Qwen2.5 72B

Data Reliability

Benchmark · VerifiedOfficial · Experimental

Data confidence: 90%

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Data Reliability

Benchmark · VerifiedOfficial · Verified

Data confidence: 90%

Why compare these models?

These models are compared because:

  • • Similar benchmark performance

Choose Qwen2.5 72B if:

  • • Lower input price

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet if:

  • • Higher overall score

Frequently Asked Questions

Which model is better: Qwen2.5 72B or Claude 3.5 Sonnet?

Based on overall scores, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ranks higher (78.4 vs 62.6). See the comparison table for a full breakdown.

Which model is cheaper: Qwen2.5 72B or Claude 3.5 Sonnet?

Qwen2.5 72B is cheaper: $1.2 vs $3 per 1M input tokens.

What are the capability differences between Qwen2.5 72B and Claude 3.5 Sonnet?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: Vision, Schlussfolgerung, Programmierung, Tool-Aufruf, Langer Kontext